Your customer needs to remove a compensation statement from the system for one employee who was NOT eligible for a merit increase. Which of the following options would help you best accomplish this?

• A. Create an eligibility rule to exclude this employee
• B. Make the employee ineligible for a merit increase using the eligibility engine
• C. Recall the compensation statement for the employee
• D. Remove the employee from the compensation form and run the 'Update all worksheets" job

Which of the following customer scenarios is a good use of the Suppress Statement function?Note There are 2 correct answers to this question.

• A. Employees in one country get a statement at a different time from those in other countries
• B. Employees who are on a performance improvement plan get a different statement from those who are not
• C. Employees who were hired after a certain date do not get a statement
• D. Employees who have an RSU grant get a statement, but those without an RSU grant do not get a statement

You have configured a worksheet for a client that uses the following formula in a custom column of type Money (curSalary ' lookupCbudgettable" customCountry 1))/100. The lookup table 'budget_table' is configured with one input and one output There are three rows in the table*USA =5*GBR = 3*' = 2 When the worksheet loads the column displays correctly but when a merit value is changed il switches to NfA for the employee What could be done to fix this behavior?

• A. Surround the curSalary with the toString function
• B. Surround the lookup function with the toNumber function.
• C. Remove the extra parentheses
• D. Change the column to be of the Amount type

A customer is using the Standard Manager hierarchy and vrould like the foltowing approval process:/1.Planning Manager/2.Next Level Manager/3.Reward Team member who launched the forms.How will you set this up in the Route Map?

• A. Manager - Manager s Manager - User
• B. Employee - Manager - User
• C. Employee - Manager - Originator
• D. Manager - Manager s Manager - Originator

Your customer uses SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central and has the following setup.*Pay Component (id = "SALARY")*Pay Component (id = CARALLOWANCE )*Pay Component (id = HOUSEALLOWANCE')*Pay Component Group (id = 'TC) made up of the above three components The Use for Compa-Ratio Calculation flag is set to Yes for this group.The customer performs total cash (TC) planning, that is. planners adjust the overall TC Both the car and housing allowances are fixed values based on employee grade If an employee is promoted on the worksheet, these allowances may change. Salary is whatever TC is left over after the new allowances are updated.How do you best implement this request while maximizing Integration?

• A. Map TC to the standard Current Salary field*Use the Merit column for the TC update.*Extract the new TC with a report and manually create import files to update EC.
• B. Map TC to the standard Current Salary field*Use the Merit column for the TC update.*Use the fin Salary field and some custom columns to calculate the components and publish those back to EC
• C. Map SALARY to the standard Current Salary field and TC to meritTarget*Use merit to update the TC and use custom fields to allow planners to update the allowances.*Publish each component back separately.
• D. Map TC to the standard Current Salary field*Use the Merit column for the TC update*Publish the finSalary value back to the pay component group in EC and have business rules split the sum into the components.